States Left to Pay for Election Costs 08/11 06:22
ATLANTA (AP) -- Congress' failure so far to pass another round of
coronavirus aid leaves state and local officials on their own to deal with the
soaring costs of holding a presidential election amid a deadly pandemic.
That could leave them scrambling to solve problems that surfaced during the
primary season in time for November's election.
The coronavirus outbreak has triggered unprecedented disruptions for
election officials across the U.S. They are dealing with staffing shortages and
budget constraints while also trying to figure out how to process a flood of
absentee ballot requests, as more and more states have moved to mail-in
balloting as a safer way to vote.
"It is appalling that Congress has not provided the needed resources for
state and local elections officials during the COVID-19 pandemic," said
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla. "Elections officials' ability to
fill the gap is nearly impossible given the already strained state and local
In its first round of virus relief in March, Congress sent $400 million to
state election offices to help cover unexpected costs related to the pandemic.
But that is far short of the $2 billion the Brennan Center for Justice has said
"Congress's failure to reach a coronavirus deal is imperiling November's
elections," said Wendy Weiser, director of the center's democracy program.
"Without an infusion of federal funds, election officials simply won't be able
to prepare adequately for the election, and we will see massive meltdowns
across the country."
In the U.S., state and local officials are responsible for administering
elections and covering the costs. But there was no way for them to plan for
holding an election in the middle of a pandemic, essentially having to deal
with a massive surge in absentee ballots while also trying to keep in-person
voting options available after many workers opted out of staffing the polls
during the primaries.
"This wasn't in anyone's budget," said Ben Hovland, chairman of the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission, which provides support for state and local
Experts point to the rocky execution of the primaries since the pandemic
began, in which there were numerous reports of absentee ballots failing to
arrive or rejected for being late. Primaries were marred by hours-long lines in
Atlanta, Milwaukee and Las Vegas as polling places were consolidated.
"Without proper funding, guidance and preparedness, the problems seen in
previous elections are going to be just the tip of the iceberg this November,"
Sylvia Albert, voting and elections director with Common Cause, warned
lawmakers during a congressional hearing last week.
If more federal money is made available, it could allow local election
offices to hire more temporary workers to help process ballot requests and
count ballots on Election Day. It also could be used to boost the pay of poll
In Ohio, Secretary of State Frank LaRose has said he would seek approval to
pay postage for absentee ballot applications and returned ballots if he had
In New Mexico, state election regulators are anticipating a $6 million
shortfall without additional funding for the November general election. Of the
nearly $3.9 million New Mexico received in the first round of congressional
virus relief, all but $750,000 was spent during the primary, according to Alex
Curtas, spokesman for Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver.
U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who has been pushing for more funding
for elections, said she remains hopeful a deal can be reached. But she warned
that the window was closing for states to take action, such as paying the cost
of postage, purchasing drop boxes for ballots, and recruiting and training a
new group of poll workers.
"If Congress acts quickly, states can still implement these measures to help
keep voters safe this November," Klobuchar said. "September seems way too late
to make a big difference."